Home > News & Blogs > 2016 Honda Pilot: Real-World Fuel Economy

2016 Honda Pilot: Real-World Fuel Economy

Honda Pilot Real-World Review: Performance, Efficiency & Comfort Tested | MotorVero

Honda Pilot Real-World Review: Putting the Three-Row SUV to the Test

Honda Pilot review

Comprehensive Road Test: Performance Across Diverse Conditions

After extensive experience with previous Pilot generations, we subjected the redesigned model to a rigorous evaluation across multiple driving scenarios. Our testing methodology included:

--FIRST CAR LIST HERE--

  • Long-distance highway cruising (over 900 miles total)
  • Mixed urban and rural route navigation
  • Varied passenger and cargo configurations
  • Different drive mode evaluations

Fuel Efficiency: Promises vs. Reality

Honda's advertised 26 mpg highway rating for the AWD Pilot with nine-speed transmission set high expectations. Our real-world testing revealed:

--TOP ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Detailed MPG Analysis

Route Type Distance Trip Computer MPG Actual Pump MPG Variance
Open Interstate 379 miles 25.7 23.2 -2.5
Mixed Driving 308 miles 23.2 20.9 -2.3
Eco Mode Highway 288 miles 27.0 25.3 -1.7

Overall trip average: 25.1 mpg (computer) vs. 23.0 mpg (actual)

Key efficiency observations:

  • Eco mode delivered the closest to advertised figures (just 2.7% below EPA)
  • Standard driving averaged 8-11% below EPA estimates
  • AC use in summer conditions impacted efficiency by approximately 1-2 mpg
  • --SECOND CAR LIST HERE--

Driving Dynamics and Comfort

The Pilot's evolution from truck-like origins to refined crossover shows in multiple aspects:

Noise Isolation

Significant improvements over previous generations with:

  • Minimal road noise even at highway speeds
  • Well-damped engine vibrations
  • Effective aerodynamic shaping reducing wind noise
  • --FIRST CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Ergonomics and Space

While generally comfortable, we noted:

  • Excellent seat support for average-height drivers
  • Potential footwell challenges for shorter drivers (under 5')
  • Class-leading 16.5 cu-ft cargo space behind third row
  • Intuitive control layout with physical buttons for key functions

Technology and Features: Hits and Misses

Our evaluation revealed both strengths and areas needing improvement:

--THIRD CAR LIST HERE--

Notable Observations

Adaptive Cruise Control: Generally reliable but exhibited occasional hesitation when detecting vehicles in adjacent lanes

Infotainment System: Responsive touchscreen with logical menu structure, though some testers preferred more tactile feedback

Navigation: Address entry occasionally lagged, with route recalculations sometimes being slower than smartphone alternatives

--SECOND CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Comparative Performance in Segment

When evaluated against competitors in MotorVero's three-row SUV comparison:

  • 6 of 7 competitors matched or exceeded EPA combined estimates
  • Previous-generation Pilot trailed its rating by 1-2 mpg
  • Current model shows improvement but still lags behind segment leaders in real-world efficiency
  • --FORTH CAR LIST HERE--

Ownership Considerations

Based on our extensive testing, potential buyers should consider:

Strengths

  • Refined highway manners ideal for long-distance travel
  • Spacious interior with flexible seating configurations
  • Improved fuel efficiency over previous generations
  • Strong predicted reliability based on Honda's track record
  • --THIRD CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Considerations

  • Actual fuel economy may fall short of EPA estimates in mixed driving
  • Some tech features may require acclimation
  • Entry height may challenge shorter drivers
  • --FIFTH CAR LIST HERE--

MotorVero provides unbiased vehicle evaluations based on extensive real-world testing. Our methodology focuses on delivering actionable insights for car buyers.

--BOTTOM ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

proImg

Motorveroben

Last Updated On Sep, 08-2025

Share Now: