Revolutionizing Car Safety: How the DAMAGE Model is Shaping the Future of Vehicle Crash Testing

Vehicle safety has always been a critical aspect of automotive design, and crash tests play a pivotal role in shaping how vehicles are built to protect their occupants. Every year, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts rigorous crash tests on various vehicles to assess their safety performance. These tests simulate real-world crash scenarios, allowing researchers to evaluate the effectiveness of vehicle safety features. However, despite advancements in crash-test technology, there have been gaps in understanding the full impact of car crashes on the human body, especially when it comes to brain injuries.

--FIRST CAR LIST HERE--

In recent years, researchers have developed groundbreaking technologies to bridge these gaps and improve the accuracy of crash-test analysis. One such innovation is the Diffuse Axonal Multi-Axis General Evaluation (DAMAGE) model, developed by the University of Virginia in 2019. Originally designed to study brain movement during football collisions, this model is now being adapted to enhance crash-test analysis and improve airbag safety in vehicles.

--TOP ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Understanding the Need for the DAMAGE Model

In the traditional crash-test methods used by IIHS, vehicles are equipped with crash-test dummies representing average adult male and female bodies, or sometimes a child-sized dummy to simulate a young passenger. These dummies are outfitted with sensors that monitor the forces acting on the head, torso, and limbs during a crash. However, these sensors are primarily designed to measure linear movements, not rotational forces, which are critical when assessing brain injuries.

--SECOND CAR LIST HERE--

In a car crash, the brain is subjected to complex movements involving both linear and rotational forces. When a driver’s head strikes the airbag or other interior surfaces, the brain undergoes a series of rapid movements, which can lead to injuries such as concussions or diffuse axonal injury (DAI). This type of injury occurs when the brain is subjected to twisting or rotational forces that cause the brain’s long nerve fibers to stretch or tear. Unfortunately, traditional crash-test dummies cannot fully capture the extent of these rotational forces, leading to an incomplete understanding of brain injury risks.

--FIRST CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

The Role of the DAMAGE Model in Enhancing Crash-Test Analysis

To address these limitations, the DAMAGE model was developed to measure both linear and rotational forces acting on the brain during a crash. This model uses a computational approach to simulate how the brain moves within the skull during a crash, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the forces at play. By incorporating the DAMAGE model into crash tests, IIHS researchers are able to gain new insights into how these complex forces affect brain health, especially in relation to airbag performance and head-injury prevention.

--THIRD CAR LIST HERE--

How DAMAGE Works in Crash Testing

The DAMAGE model takes into account not only the linear forces that push the body forward during a crash but also the rotational forces that twist and turn the head. By simulating the brain’s movement in real time, the model provides a more accurate prediction of how the brain would respond to different crash scenarios. This includes understanding how the head moves in response to the initial impact, how it rebounds off the airbag or dashboard, and how it continues to move as the vehicle comes to a stop.

--SECOND CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

The DAMAGE model has been tested on over 800 crash-test dummies, with a particular focus on how modifications to airbag design can reduce the rotational forces that contribute to brain injuries. By analyzing these tests, IIHS researchers are able to identify ways to improve airbag technology, making it more effective at reducing the risk of brain injury in car crashes.

--FORTH CAR LIST HERE--

Filling in the Gaps: Improving Airbag Design

One of the key benefits of the DAMAGE model is its ability to reveal previously unnoticed aspects of crash dynamics. While many of the crash-test results reaffirmed previous conclusions about head protection, the DAMAGE model provided new insights into how airbag modifications could improve safety even further. For example, IIHS researchers discovered that deeper front airbags, which are softer in the middle, could better cradle the head and reduce the chances of the head rebounding onto other interior surfaces, such as the dashboard or windshield.

--THIRD CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

These findings suggest that minor adjustments to airbag design could have a significant impact on reducing brain injury risks. Airbags with improved geometry and more sophisticated deployment mechanisms could help to slow down the head’s movement more gently, allowing for better protection against rotational forces. Additionally, the DAMAGE model could inform adjustments to other safety features, such as seat belts, to ensure that the entire occupant protection system works in harmony to minimize injury risk.

--FIFTH CAR LIST HERE--

Broader Implications for Vehicle Safety

The introduction of the DAMAGE model into crash testing represents a major leap forward in vehicle safety research. By incorporating this advanced computational model, IIHS is able to assess a vehicle’s performance more holistically, taking into account both linear and rotational forces that affect brain injury risk. As researchers continue to refine the DAMAGE model and integrate it into crash-test protocols, we can expect even more precise recommendations for improving car safety features.

--BOTTOM ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Moreover, this technology could have broader implications for other areas of automotive safety. For instance, it could help improve the design of other impact-absorbing systems in the vehicle, such as the dashboard, steering wheel, and side-impact airbags. It could also lead to better understanding of how the vehicle’s interior layout impacts occupant safety, with a focus on minimizing injury during both frontal and side-impact crashes.

Expanding the Scope of Vehicle Safety Testing

As part of its ongoing commitment to improving vehicle safety, IIHS has also updated its crash-test protocols to include more detailed assessments of rear-occupant safety. In addition to traditional frontal crash tests, IIHS now conducts tests that evaluate how well rear passengers are protected in a collision. This includes assessing the effectiveness of seat belt pretensioners and rear airbags, as well as the overall structural integrity of the rear seat area.

These changes, along with the incorporation of the DAMAGE model, highlight IIHS’s commitment to providing a more comprehensive evaluation of vehicle safety. By considering the full spectrum of crash dynamics—both linear and rotational forces—IIHS aims to provide automakers with the data they need to make more informed decisions about vehicle design and occupant protection.

--SIXTH CAR LIST HERE--

Looking Toward the Future of Vehicle Safety

The DAMAGE model represents just one example of how new technologies are transforming the way we understand car crashes and improve vehicle safety. As research in this field continues to evolve, we can expect even more innovative approaches to reducing the risk of injury in car accidents. From better airbag systems to improved vehicle interiors and advanced safety features, the future of automotive safety looks increasingly promising.

In the meantime, IIHS will continue to refine its crash-test procedures and use the DAMAGE model to gain deeper insights into how to protect the brain during a car crash. While the agency has not yet made any significant changes to its Top Safety Pick and Top Safety Pick+ designations, the inclusion of DAMAGE scores in technical reports will help consumers make more informed choices about the vehicles they drive.

Ultimately, the integration of the DAMAGE model into crash testing is a significant step toward achieving safer vehicles for all road users. By continually advancing our understanding of how the human body responds to car crashes, we can work toward reducing the number of lives lost or changed by traumatic brain injuries in the future.