Home > News & Blogs > 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Review: A Budget-Friendly Sedan with Rally Roots

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Review: A Budget-Friendly Sedan with Rally Roots

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Review: Aged Competitor With Standout AWD | MotorVero

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Review: The AWD Compact Sedan That Time Forgot

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

                               

In an era where compact sedans evolved into tech-laden transportation, the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer stands as a reminder of simpler times. While competitors like the Honda Civic and Ford Focus embraced sophistication, the Lancer clung to its basic formula: straightforward transportation with the rare advantage of available all-wheel drive. This comprehensive review examines where the Lancer still shines and where it falls critically behind modern standards.

  • --FIRST CAR LIST HERE--

Exterior Design: Timeless Angles in a Curved World

Lancer vs Civic

The Lancer's sharp, angular styling has remained remarkably consistent since its 2007 redesign. Where competitors experimented with fluidic design language (the jellybean-shaped Focus) before returning to sharper lines, the Lancer maintained its distinctive wedge profile. The design has aged well visually, though certain elements betray its age:

  • Exposed backup camera: The optional rearview camera protrudes noticeably from the trunk lid, lacking the integrated design of newer vehicles
  • Lighting technology: Uses conventional halogen bulbs rather than modern LED or HID setups
  • Wheel designs: 16-inch and 18-inch wheel options look dated compared to contemporary designs
  • --TOP ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

Key Exterior Dimensions

Measurement 2016 Lancer Honda Civic
Length 182.7 in 182.3 in
Wheelbase 103.7 in 106.3 in
Turning Circle 34.8 ft 35.4 ft

Driving Dynamics: Comfort Over Sport

Gone are the days when the Lancer Evolution's rally-bred DNA trickled down to mainstream models. The 2016 Lancer prioritizes ride comfort over athleticism, creating a distinctly different experience from sportier competitors:

Powertrain Performance

Two engine options were available:

  1. 2.0L MIVEC 4-cylinder: 148 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 145 lb-ft @ 4,200 rpm
  2. 2.4L MIVEC 4-cylinder: 168 hp @ 6,000 rpm, 167 lb-ft @ 4,100 rpm

The continuously variable transmission (CVT) mimics traditional automatic behavior with simulated shift points, avoiding the "rubber band" effect of inferior CVTs. However, acceleration feels lethargic compared to class leaders:

  • 0-60 mph: 8.2 seconds (2.4L AWC CVT) vs 6.8 seconds for Civic 1.5T
  • Quarter mile: 16.5 seconds @ 86 mph
  • --FIRST CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

All-Wheel Control System

The Lancer's standout feature remains its sophisticated AWD system with three modes:

Mode Function Best Use Case
2WD Front-wheel drive only Dry pavement for maximum fuel economy
AWC Automatic torque distribution up to 50/50 split Variable conditions, light snow/rain
Lock Fixed 50/50 torque split Deep snow, off-road, steep climbs

Interior and Technology: Where Age Shows Most

The cabin reveals the Lancer's greatest weaknesses compared to modern compact sedans:

Notable Shortcomings

  • Infotainment: Base models use a 2-DIN stereo with physical buttons, while the optional touchscreen lacks smartphone integration
  • Materials: Hard plastics dominate surfaces that competitors cover with soft-touch materials
  • Ergonomics: Non-telescoping steering wheel forces uncomfortable seating positions for taller drivers
  • Storage: 12.3 cu-ft trunk trails Civic's 15.1 cu-ft capacity

Safety and Reliability Considerations

NHTSA gave the 2016 Lancer 4 out of 5 stars overall, with 4-star frontal crash and rollover ratings. Key safety features include:

--SECOND CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

  • Seven airbags (including driver knee airbag)
  • Anti-lock brakes with electronic brake-force distribution
  • Active stability control
  • Optional rearview camera (not standard until 2018 models)

Reliability data from multiple sources shows:

  • J.D. Power Predicted Reliability: 3/5
  • Common issues: CVT shuddering, electrical gremlins, premature brake wear
  • Average repair costs: 15% below segment average
  • Fuel Economy: Competitive But Not Class-Leading
  • --SECOND CAR LIST HERE--
Configuration City MPG Highway MPG Combined
2.0L FWD CVT 27 35 30
2.4L AWD CVT 23 30 26

Real-world testing shows these estimates are accurate, unlike some Mitsubishi models affected by the Japanese fuel economy scandal.


Competitive Comparison: Who Should Consider the 2016 Lancer?

The Lancer makes the most sense for:

Budget-conscious buyers in snowy climates: The AWD system provides genuine winter capability at a lower price than Subaru

  • Drivers who prioritize simplicity: Those who prefer physical controls over touchscreen interfaces
  • Used car shoppers: Strong depreciation makes used Lancers excellent values

Alternative vehicles to consider:

  1. Subaru Impreza: More refined AWD system, better interior, but rougher ride
  2. Honda Civic: Superior in nearly every metric except AWD availability
  3. Ford Focus: More engaging drive, but plagued by transmission issues
  4. --THIRD CONTENT ADVERTISEMENT HERE--

The Verdict: A Niche Player in a Competitive Field

The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer survives on the strength of its all-wheel drive system and comfortable ride, making it a compelling choice for specific buyers. While it can't match the refinement, technology, or efficiency of newer competitors, its straightforward mechanics and winter capability give it lasting appeal in certain markets. For used car shoppers prioritizing AWD on a budget, the Lancer remains worth considering - but test drive the competition first.


proImg

Klash

Last Updated On Oct, 08-2025

Share Now: